You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of conventional continuous positive airway pressure to continuous positive airway pressure titration performed with sleep endoscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Laryngoscope, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/lary.22494 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Senol Civelek, Ismet Emrah Emre, Denizhan Dizdar, Caglar Cuhadaroglu, Birsen Karaci Eksioglu, Algın Kayar Eraslan, Suat Turgut |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the effect and obtain a pressure value of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) under direct visualization using drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) and compare the pressure values with values obtained using conventional CPAP. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 20% |
| Unknown | 18 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 59% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2012.
All research outputs
#20,213,884
of 24,851,605 outputs
Outputs from The Laryngoscope
#4,647
of 6,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,272
of 256,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Laryngoscope
#53
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,851,605 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.