| Title |
Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, June 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-003-0539-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erol Gercek, Vincent Arlet, Josee Delisle, Dante Marchesi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 25% |
| Unknown | 25 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 38% |
| Engineering | 14 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 32 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,415,350
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#330
of 5,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,914
of 52,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,258 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them