↓ Skip to main content

「図書館情報学概論」デビット・ボーデン,リン・ロビンソン著/「水漏れから図書館資料を救おう !」眞野節雄編著

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
「図書館情報学概論」デビット・ボーデン,リン・ロビンソン著/「水漏れから図書館資料を救おう !」眞野節雄編著
Published in
Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu, December 2019
DOI 10.18919/jkg.69.12_620
Authors

事務局

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2019.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu
#385
of 1,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,349
of 473,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu
#11
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,212 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.