You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Regionalism and Great Power Management in the Asia–Pacific: Complementary or Competing Forces?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Asian Studies Review, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1080/10357823.2019.1690425 |
| Authors |
Benjamin Zala |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Indonesia | 2 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 72% |
| Scientists | 8 | 28% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 6 | 33% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,089,323
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Asian Studies Review
#34
of 595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,936
of 479,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Studies Review
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.