You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Regionalism as an Instrument for Global Power Contestation: The Case of China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Asian Studies Review, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1080/10357823.2019.1691503 |
| Authors |
Baogang He |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Ghana | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 15 | 45% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,385,862
of 25,218,929 outputs
Outputs from Asian Studies Review
#169
of 579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,392
of 472,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Studies Review
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,218,929 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.