↓ Skip to main content

Ratio of Cesarean Sections to Total Procedures as a Marker of District Hospital Trauma Capacity

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Ratio of Cesarean Sections to Total Procedures as a Marker of District Hospital Trauma Capacity
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00268-012-1629-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robin T. Petroze, Winta Mehtsun, Albert Nzayisenga, Georges Ntakiyiruta, Robert G. Sawyer, J. Forrest Calland

Abstract

There are few established metrics to define surgical capacity in resource-limited settings. Previous work hypothesizes that the relative frequency of cesarean sections (CS) at a hospital, expressed as a proportion of total operative procedures (%CS), may serve as a proxy measure of surgical capacity. We attempted to evaluate this hypothesis as it specifically relates to hospital capacity for emergency interventions for injury.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,954,749
of 23,755,107 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#825
of 4,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,081
of 165,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#7
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,755,107 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.