| Title |
Vitamin C-related nutrient–nutrient and nutrient–gene interactions that modify folate status
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nutrition, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00394-012-0359-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark Lucock, Zoë Yates, Lyndell Boyd, Charlotte Naylor, Jeong-Hwa Choi, Xiaowei Ng, Virginia Skinner, Ron Wai, Jeremy Kho, Sa Tang, Paul Roach, Martin Veysey |
| Abstract |
Folate-related nutrient-nutrient and nutrient-gene interactions modify disease risk; we therefore examined synergistic relationships between dietary folic acid, vitamin C and variant folate genes with respect to red cell folate status. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 37 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 19% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2013.
All research outputs
#14,143,926
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#1,580
of 2,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,001
of 162,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#17
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.