↓ Skip to main content

Historical reviews of the assessment of human cardiovascular function: interrogation and understanding of the control of skin blood flow

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Historical reviews of the assessment of human cardiovascular function: interrogation and understanding of the control of skin blood flow
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00421-019-04246-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

David. A. Low, Helen Jones, N. Tim Cable, Lacy M. Alexander, W. Larry Kenney

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Master 8 11%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 13 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Engineering 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 20 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,161,742
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,164
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,899
of 474,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#17
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.