↓ Skip to main content

Established and potential therapeutic applications of cannabinoids in oncology

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, August 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Established and potential therapeutic applications of cannabinoids in oncology
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, August 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00520-002-0387-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Declan Walsh, Kristine A. Nelson, Fade Mahmoud

Abstract

Cannabis occurs naturally in the dried flowering or fruiting tops of the Cannabis sativa plant. Cannabis is most often consumed by smoking marihuana. Cannabinoids are the active compounds extracted from cannabis. Recently, there has been renewed interest in cannabinoids for medicinal purposes. The two proven indications for the use of the synthetic cannabinoid (dronabinol) are chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and AIDS-related anorexia. Other possible effects that may prove beneficial in the oncology population include analgesia, antitumor effect, mood elevation, muscle relaxation, and relief of insomnia. Two types of cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2, have been detected. CB1 receptors are expressed mainly in the central and peripheral nervous system. CB2 receptors are found in certain nonneuronal tissues, particularly in the immune cells. Recent discovery of both the cannabinoid receptors and endocannabinoids has opened a new era in research on the pharmaceutical applications of cannabinoids. The use of cannabinoids should be continued in the areas indicated, and further studies are needed to evaluate other potential uses in clinical oncology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 172 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 15%
Researcher 26 15%
Student > Bachelor 25 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Other 14 8%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 37 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 27%
Chemistry 13 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 7%
Psychology 12 7%
Other 38 22%
Unknown 41 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2015.
All research outputs
#15,278,190
of 25,541,640 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#2,904
of 5,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,732
of 49,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,541,640 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.