↓ Skip to main content

Prospective randomized comparison of radiation exposure from full spine radiographs obtained in three different techniques

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Prospective randomized comparison of radiation exposure from full spine radiographs obtained in three different techniques
Published in
European Spine Journal, April 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00586-005-1005-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Torsten Kluba, Jürgen Schäfer, Tobias Hahnfeldt, Thomas Niemeyer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 33 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 20%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Engineering 4 11%
Physics and Astronomy 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2016.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#2,016
of 5,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,361
of 87,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,388 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.