↓ Skip to main content

Genetic variants in RBFOX3 are associated with sleep latency

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Human Genetics, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic variants in RBFOX3 are associated with sleep latency
Published in
European Journal of Human Genetics, May 2016
DOI 10.1038/ejhg.2016.31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Najaf Amin, Karla V Allebrandt, Ashley van der Spek, Bertram Müller-Myhsok, Karin Hek, Maris Teder-Laving, Caroline Hayward, Tõnu Esko, Josine G van Mill, Hamdi Mbarek, Nathaniel F Watson, Scott A Melville, Fabiola M Del Greco, Enda M Byrne, Edwin Oole, Ivana Kolcic, Ting-hsu Chen, Daniel S Evans, Josef Coresh, Nicole Vogelzangs, Juha Karjalainen, Gonneke Willemsen, Sina A Gharib, Lina Zgaga, Evelin Mihailov, Katie L Stone, Harry Campbell, Rutger WW Brouwer, Ayse Demirkan, Aaron Isaacs, Zoran Dogas, Kristin D Marciante, Susan Campbell, Fran Borovecki, Annemarie I Luik, Man Li, Jouke Jan Hottenga, Jennifer E Huffman, Mirjam CGN van den Hout, Steven R Cummings, Yurii S Aulchenko, Philip R Gehrman, André G Uitterlinden, Heinz-Erich Wichmann, Martina Müller-Nurasyid, Rudolf SN Fehrmann, Grant W Montgomery, Albert Hofman, Wen Hong Linda Kao, Ben A Oostra, Alan F Wright, Jacqueline M Vink, James F Wilson, Peter P Pramstaller, Andrew A Hicks, Ozren Polasek, Naresh M Punjabi, Susan Redline, Bruce M Psaty, Andrew C Heath, Martha Merrow, Gregory J Tranah, Daniel J Gottlieb, Dorret I Boomsma, Nicholas G Martin, Igor Rudan, Henning Tiemeier, Wilfred FJ van IJcken, Brenda W Penninx, Andres Metspalu, Thomas Meitinger, Lude Franke, Till Roenneberg, Cornelia M van Duijn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Researcher 10 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 9%
Professor 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 21 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 15%
Psychology 9 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 23 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2017.
All research outputs
#5,517,069
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Human Genetics
#1,366
of 3,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,577
of 316,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Human Genetics
#33
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.