↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Frequency Discrimination Training on Tinnitus: Results from Two Randomised Controlled Trials

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Effects of Frequency Discrimination Training on Tinnitus: Results from Two Randomised Controlled Trials
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10162-012-0323-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Derek J. Hoare, Victoria L. Kowalkowski, Deborah A. Hall

Abstract

That auditory perceptual training may alleviate tinnitus draws on two observations: (1) tinnitus probably arises from altered activity within the central auditory system following hearing loss and (2) sound-based training can change central auditory activity. Training that provides sound enrichment across hearing loss frequencies has therefore been hypothesised to alleviate tinnitus. We tested this prediction with two randomised trials of frequency discrimination training involving a total of 70 participants with chronic subjective tinnitus. Participants trained on either (1) a pure-tone standard at a frequency within their region of normal hearing, (2) a pure-tone standard within the region of hearing loss or (3) a high-pass harmonic complex tone spanning a region of hearing loss. Analysis of the primary outcome measure revealed an overall reduction in self-reported tinnitus handicap after training that was maintained at a 1-month follow-up assessment, but there were no significant differences between groups. Secondary analyses also report the effects of different domains of tinnitus handicap on the psychoacoustical characteristics of the tinnitus percept (sensation level, bandwidth and pitch) and on duration of training. Our overall findings and conclusions cast doubt on the superiority of a purely acoustic mechanism to underpin tinnitus remediation. Rather, the nonspecific patterns of improvement are more suggestive that auditory perceptual training affects impact on a contributory mechanism such as selective attention or emotional state.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Trinidad and Tobago 1 2%
Unknown 61 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 28%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 23%
Psychology 8 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 18 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,772,512
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
#88
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,569
of 163,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.