↓ Skip to main content

Evidence‐Based Surgery: Barriers, Solutions, and the Role of Evidence Synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Evidence‐Based Surgery: Barriers, Solutions, and the Role of Evidence Synthesis
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00268-012-1597-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

George Garas, Amel Ibrahim, Hutan Ashrafian, Kamran Ahmed, Vanash Patel, Koji Okabayashi, Petros Skapinakis, Ara Darzi, Thanos Athanasiou

Abstract

Surgery is a rapidly evolving field, making the rigorous testing of emerging innovations vital. However, most surgical research fails to employ randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and has particularly been based on low-quality study designs. Subsequently, the analysis of data through meta-analysis and evidence synthesis is particularly difficult.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Mexico 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 61 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Master 8 12%
Other 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 21 32%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 56%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 15 23%