| Title |
Local versus general anesthesia for transfemoral aortic valve implantation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Research in Cardiology, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00392-011-0362-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lukas J. Motloch, Dennis Rottlaender, Sara Reda, Robert Larbig, Marie Bruns, Jochen Müller-Ehmsen, Justus Strauch, Navid Madershahian, Erland Erdmann, Thorsten Wahlers, Uta C. Hoppe |
| Abstract |
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) represents a novel option for elderly with severe aortic valve stenosis who are denied surgical aortic valve replacement due to high perioperative risk. While transfemoral TAVI generally is being performed in general anesthesia (GA), TAVI under local anesthesia plus mild sedation (LAPS) might be an effective and safe alternative. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 25% |
| Unknown | 19 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 53% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2018.
All research outputs
#5,613,684
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#198
of 805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,777
of 130,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.