↓ Skip to main content

Real-World Effectiveness and Real-World Cost-Effectiveness of Intravitreal Aflibercept and Intravitreal Ranibizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis…

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Therapy, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Real-World Effectiveness and Real-World Cost-Effectiveness of Intravitreal Aflibercept and Intravitreal Ranibizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Studies
Published in
Advances in Therapy, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12325-019-01147-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joao Carrasco, Georg-Alexander Pietsch, Marie-Pierre Nicolas, Cecile Koerber, Craig Bennison, Jisu Yoon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 26 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 31%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Computer Science 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 29 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2019.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Therapy
#1,486
of 2,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,672
of 376,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Therapy
#36
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.