↓ Skip to main content

Modeling Planarian Regeneration: A Primer for Reverse-Engineering the Worm

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
4 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modeling Planarian Regeneration: A Primer for Reverse-Engineering the Worm
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002481
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Lobo, Wendy S. Beane, Michael Levin

Abstract

A mechanistic understanding of robust self-assembly and repair capabilities of complex systems would have enormous implications for basic evolutionary developmental biology as well as for transformative applications in regenerative biomedicine and the engineering of highly fault-tolerant cybernetic systems. Molecular biologists are working to identify the pathways underlying the remarkable regenerative abilities of model species that perfectly regenerate limbs, brains, and other complex body parts. However, a profound disconnect remains between the deluge of high-resolution genetic and protein data on pathways required for regeneration, and the desired spatial, algorithmic models that show how self-monitoring and growth control arise from the synthesis of cellular activities. This barrier to progress in the understanding of morphogenetic controls may be breached by powerful techniques from the computational sciences-using non-traditional modeling approaches to reverse-engineer systems such as planaria: flatworms with a complex bodyplan and nervous system that are able to regenerate any body part after traumatic injury. Currently, the involvement of experts from outside of molecular genetics is hampered by the specialist literature of molecular developmental biology: impactful collaborations across such different fields require that review literature be available that presents the key functional capabilities of important biological model systems while abstracting away from the often irrelevant and confusing details of specific genes and proteins. To facilitate modeling efforts by computer scientists, physicists, engineers, and mathematicians, we present a different kind of review of planarian regeneration. Focusing on the main patterning properties of this system, we review what is known about the signal exchanges that occur during regenerative repair in planaria and the cellular mechanisms that are thought to underlie them. By establishing an engineering-like style for reviews of the molecular developmental biology of biomedically important model systems, significant fresh insights and quantitative computational models will be developed by new collaborations between biology and the information sciences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Spain 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 231 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 57 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 19%
Researcher 36 15%
Student > Master 15 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 5%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 51 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Computer Science 8 3%
Physics and Astronomy 8 3%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 57 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2023.
All research outputs
#862,995
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#639
of 9,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,188
of 176,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#7
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.