↓ Skip to main content

A Twin Study of Drinking and Smoking Onset and Latencies from First Use to Regular Use

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Genetics, November 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
A Twin Study of Drinking and Smoking Onset and Latencies from First Use to Regular Use
Published in
Behavior Genetics, November 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1021622820644
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. C. Stallings, J. K. Hewitt, T. Beresford, A. C. Heath, L. J. Eaves

Abstract

The early onset of alcohol and tobacco use has been associated with increased risk for later substance abuse and dependence problems. This study investigated genetic and environmental influences on age at onset of alcohol and tobacco use by examining twin resemblance for several retrospectively reported onset milestones including age at first use, age at first alcohol intoxication experience, and age at regular use. In addition, we also examined the latency between age at first use and age at regular use of tobacco and alcohol. The subjects were a volunteer sample of older adult twins 50 to 96 years of age. MZ twin correlations for age at first alcohol use and age at first tobacco use were .57 and .44, respectively, compared to .45 and .37 for DZ same-sex twins. MZ twins correlated .30 and .26 for the latencies between first use and regular use of alcohol and of tobacco, while DZ correlations were -.01 and .05, respectively. Biometrical model-fitting results confirmed that familial resemblance for age at first use for both alcohol and tobacco was largely the result of shared environmental factors, while the latencies between first use and regular patterns of use were more genetically influenced. These findings add to a growing body of literature suggesting that initiation of substance use is influenced primarily by environmental rather than genetic factors.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 12%
Professor 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2001.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Genetics
#408
of 969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,675
of 36,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Genetics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them