↓ Skip to main content

Safety and acceptability of suprascapular nerve block in rheumatology patients

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Safety and acceptability of suprascapular nerve block in rheumatology patients
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10067-011-1813-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Michael Shanahan, Kieran R. Shanahan, Catherine L. Hill, Michael J. Ahern, Malcolm D. Smith

Abstract

Suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) is a popular treatment for shoulder pain. To date, studies undertaken mainly describe the methods of performing the technique or are trials examining its efficacy. As a result, the numbers of blocks reported are small and therefore confidence in the safety of the procedure must be limited. Furthermore, although most studies report pain reduction using visual analogue scales, there are no reports of patient satisfaction with the subsequent pain relief. This study aimed (1) to determine the safety of SSNB in a population of patients presenting in rheumatology practice and (2) to determine the patient satisfaction with the pain relief. From 2003 to 2009, 1,005 SSNBs were undertaken by rheumatologists in several centres in South Australia. All patients who had at least one SSNB performed were identified. Case notes were examined and patients were contacted to identify any side effects from the procedure. Patients were also asked to report their satisfaction with the pain relief. Of the 1,005 nerve blocks performed, there were a total of six side effects. They were three episodes of transient dizziness, two episodes of transient arm weakness and one episode of facial flushing. There were no serious side effects reported. Patient satisfaction with the pain relief was high, with over 80% of respondents being satisfied or very satisfied with the result. SSNB is a very safe procedure in the outpatient setting, even among frail, elderly patients. Patients rate the satisfaction with the pain relief highly.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 11%
Other 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Lecturer 3 7%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 11 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Psychology 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,773
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#2,297
of 2,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,084
of 119,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#15
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.