↓ Skip to main content

Reliability and criterion validity of self-measured waist, hip, and neck circumferences

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
Reliability and criterion validity of self-measured waist, hip, and neck circumferences
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12874-016-0150-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pamela Barrios, Jennifer Martin-Biggers, Virginia Quick, Carol Byrd-Bredbenner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 19%
Student > Bachelor 20 19%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Other 7 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 33 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 12%
Sports and Recreations 9 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 37 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2021.
All research outputs
#15,563,090
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,491
of 2,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,991
of 314,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#19
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.