You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Model of Pathways to Treatment: Conceptualization and integration with existing theory
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of Health Psychology, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02077.x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
S. E. Scott, F. M. Walter, A. Webster, S. Sutton, J. Emery |
Abstract |
Studying and understanding pathways to diagnosis and treatment is vital for the development of successful interventions to encourage early detection, presentation, and diagnosis. An existing framework posited to describe the decisional and behavioural processes that occur prior to treatment (Andersen et al.'s General Model of Total Patient Delay) does not appear to match the complex and dynamic nature of the pathways into and through the health care system or provide a clear framework for research. Therefore a revised descriptive framework, the Model of Pathways to Treatment, has been proposed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 248 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 16% |
Student > Master | 39 | 16% |
Researcher | 27 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
Other | 54 | 22% |
Unknown | 51 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 27% |
Psychology | 28 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 18 | 7% |
Unspecified | 7 | 3% |
Other | 37 | 15% |
Unknown | 66 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2019.
All research outputs
#15,593,749
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Health Psychology
#763
of 877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,206
of 167,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Health Psychology
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.