You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The 1000 Genomes Project: data management and community access
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.1974 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Clarke, Xiangqun Zheng-Bradley, Richard Smith, Eugene Kulesha, Chunlin Xiao, Iliana Toneva, Brendan Vaughan, Don Preuss, Rasko Leinonen, Martin Shumway, Stephen Sherry, Paul Flicek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 43% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 48% |
| Scientists | 21 | 48% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 525 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 2% |
| Brazil | 6 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Norway | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 3% |
| Unknown | 472 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 119 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 115 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 71 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 99 | 19% |
| Unknown | 48 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 216 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 91 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 40 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 59 | 11% |
| Unknown | 65 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2020.
All research outputs
#919,275
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,202
of 5,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,531
of 179,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#10
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.