| Title |
Evaluation of a primary care-based opioid and pain review service: a mixed-methods evaluation in two GP practices in England
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x707237 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lauren J Scott, Joanna M Kesten, Kevin Bache, Matthew Hickman, Rona Campbell, Anthony E Pickering, Sabi Redwood, Kyla Thomas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 40% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 13% |
| Psychology | 6 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,564,994
of 24,510,033 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#778
of 4,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,771
of 468,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#18
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,510,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 468,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.