You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnostic Potential of Saliva: Current State and Future Applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Chemistry, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1373/clinchem.2010.153767 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tina Pfaffe, Justin Cooper-White, Peter Beyerlein, Karam Kostner, Chamindie Punyadeera |
| Abstract |
Over the past 10 years, the use of saliva as a diagnostic fluid has gained attention and has become a translational research success story. Some of the current nanotechnologies have been demonstrated to have the analytical sensitivity required for the use of saliva as a diagnostic medium to detect and predict disease progression. However, these technologies have not yet been integrated into current clinical practice and work flow. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 735 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Poland | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 723 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 118 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 101 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 95 | 13% |
| Researcher | 82 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 55 | 7% |
| Other | 119 | 16% |
| Unknown | 165 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 170 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 89 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 71 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 49 | 7% |
| Engineering | 47 | 6% |
| Other | 102 | 14% |
| Unknown | 207 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,218,731
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Chemistry
#312
of 7,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,594
of 125,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Chemistry
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.