↓ Skip to main content

Trauma in Early Childhood: A Neglected Population

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 389)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
347 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trauma in Early Childhood: A Neglected Population
Published in
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10567-011-0094-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra C. De Young, Justin A. Kenardy, Vanessa E. Cobham

Abstract

Infants, toddlers and preschoolers are a high risk group for exposure to trauma. Young children are also vulnerable to experiencing adverse outcomes as they are undergoing a rapid developmental period, have limited coping skills and are strongly dependent on their primary caregiver to protect them physically and emotionally. However, although millions of young children experience trauma each year, this population has been largely neglected. Fortunately, over the last 2 decades there has been a growing appreciation of the magnitude of the problem with a small but expanding number of dedicated researchers and clinicians working with this population. This review examines the empirical literature on trauma in young children with regards to the following factors: (1) how trauma reactions typically manifest in young children; (2) history and diagnostic validity of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in preschoolers; (3) prevalence, comorbidity and course of trauma reactions; (4) developmental considerations; (5) risk and protective factors; and (6) treatment. The review highlights that there are unique developmental differences in the rate and manifestation of trauma symptomatology, the current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., DSM-IV-TR) PTSD criteria is not developmentally sensitive and the impact of trauma must be considered within the context of the parent-child relationship. Recommendations for future research with this population are also discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 347 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Israel 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 337 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 75 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 12%
Student > Bachelor 35 10%
Researcher 25 7%
Other 43 12%
Unknown 77 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 148 43%
Social Sciences 46 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 5%
Arts and Humanities 12 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 3%
Other 21 6%
Unknown 91 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2023.
All research outputs
#980,027
of 24,501,737 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#44
of 389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,548
of 113,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,501,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.