| Title |
Iridoid glycosides as oviposition stimulants for the buckeye butterfly,Junonia coenia (Nymphalidae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Chemical Ecology, March 1988
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01018783 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patricia C. Pereyra1, M. Deane Bowers |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 57% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#719
of 2,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,713
of 12,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.