| Title |
An ESICM systematic review and meta-analysis of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic therapy algorithms in adult critically ill patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-012-2563-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dimitrios K. Matthaiou, Georgia Ntani, Marina Kontogiorgi, Garyfallia Poulakou, Apostolos Armaganidis, George Dimopoulos |
| Abstract |
We sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of procalcitonin(PCT)-guided antibiotic therapy algorithms for critically ill adult patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 25% |
| France | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Researcher | 17 | 13% |
| Professor | 15 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 38 | 29% |
| Unknown | 20 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 68% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,530,736
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,332
of 5,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,409
of 179,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#4
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.