You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How does comorbidity influence healthcare costs? A population-based cross-sectional study of depression, back pain and osteoarthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000809 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John Carstensen, David Andersson, Malin André, Sven Engström, Henrik Magnusson, Lars Axel Borgquist |
| Abstract |
To analyse how comorbidity among patients with back pain, depression and osteoarthritis influences healthcare costs per patient. A special focus was made on the distribution of costs for primary healthcare compared with specialist care, hospital care and drugs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 20% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 32% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,304,457
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#11,745
of 25,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,315
of 179,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#67
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.