| Title |
Reporting quality of Cochrane systematic reviews with Chinese herbal medicines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1218-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xuan Zhang, Qi-Ying Aixinjueluo, Si-Yao Li, Lisa-L Song, Chung-Tai Lau, Ran Tan, Zhao-Xiang Bian |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 22% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 22% |
| Researcher | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 11% |
| Engineering | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2020.
All research outputs
#18,040,081
of 23,179,757 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,719
of 2,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#318,387
of 459,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#69
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,179,757 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.