↓ Skip to main content

Tropospheric New Particle Formation and the Role of Ions

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Tropospheric New Particle Formation and the Role of Ions
Published in
Space Science Reviews, June 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11214-008-9388-2
Authors

Jan Kazil, R. Giles Harrison, Edward R. Lovejoy

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Other 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 8 26%
Chemistry 7 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 16%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#614
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,034
of 100,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#10
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.