↓ Skip to main content

CBC MACs for Arbitrary-Length Messages: The Three-Key Constructions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cryptology, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
CBC MACs for Arbitrary-Length Messages: The Three-Key Constructions
Published in
Journal of Cryptology, February 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00145-004-0016-3
Authors

John Black, Phillip Rogaway

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 18 60%
Mathematics 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,480,713
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cryptology
#89
of 238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,662
of 59,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cryptology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them