Title |
Follow-Up After Myocardial Infarction to Explore the Stability of Arrhythmogenic Substrate The Footprint Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.10.002 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Beatriz Jáuregui, David Soto-Iglesias, Diego Penela, Juan Acosta, Juan Fernández-Armenta, Markus Linhart, Cheryl Terés, Vladimir Syrovnev, Fatima Zaraket, Vanessa Hervàs, Susana Prat-González, Rosario J Perea, Manuel Morales-Ruiz, Wladimiro Jiménez, Luis Lasalvia, Xavier Bosch, José T Ortiz-Pérez, Antonio Berruezo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 9 | 26% |
United States | 2 | 6% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
Chile | 1 | 3% |
Peru | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Panama | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Dominican Republic | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 14 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 29 | 85% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
Scientists | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 16% |
Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
Researcher | 3 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 28% |
Engineering | 7 | 28% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,800,892
of 25,845,749 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#417
of 1,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,499
of 482,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#13
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.