↓ Skip to main content

Which coordinate system for modelling path integration?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Theoretical Biology, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Which coordinate system for modelling path integration?
Published in
Journal of Theoretical Biology, December 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.11.021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert J. Vickerstaff, Allen Cheung

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Germany 3 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 83 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 31%
Researcher 23 24%
Student > Master 12 13%
Professor 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 7 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 29%
Neuroscience 15 16%
Computer Science 13 14%
Psychology 5 5%
Physics and Astronomy 5 5%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 14 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#8,261,140
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Theoretical Biology
#1,207
of 4,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,163
of 177,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Theoretical Biology
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.