You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
RETRACTED: Randomized controlled trial comparing treatment outcome of two compression bandaging systems and standard care without compression in patients with venous leg ulcers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Vascular Surgery, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Irene K.Y. Wong, Anneke Andriessen, Diana T.F. Lee, David Thompson, Lau Yun Wong, David V.K. Chao, Winnie K.W. So, M. Abel |
| Abstract |
Compression therapy is not common for venous leg ulcer patients in Hong Kong. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 20 | 20% |
| Unknown | 19 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2012.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Vascular Surgery
#5,290
of 6,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,900
of 182,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Vascular Surgery
#31
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.