↓ Skip to main content

HIV testing experiences in Nairobi slums: the good, the bad and the ugly

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
HIV testing experiences in Nairobi slums: the good, the bad and the ugly
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12889-019-7975-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eliud Wekesa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Researcher 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 22 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Social Sciences 7 11%
Psychology 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 28 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2019.
All research outputs
#20,594,080
of 23,179,757 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#14,144
of 15,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#384,794
of 459,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#335
of 363 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,179,757 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 363 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.