↓ Skip to main content

Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluation auf Grundlage von GKV-Routinedaten

Overview of attention for article published in Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluation auf Grundlage von GKV-Routinedaten
Published in
Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00103-012-1476-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Schreyögg, T. Stargardt

Abstract

Although the quality of administrative data of German health insurance is relatively good, administrative data are rarely used for the purpose of health economic evaluations in Germany. Health economic evaluations in Germany have so far mainly been performed based on primary data while in other countries the use of secondary data is quite common. The objective of the article is to give an introduction into the possibilities of performing health economic evaluations based on administrative data. First, we show that German health insurance have data sets that allow the follow-up of patients across all sectors of health care. Subsequently, characteristics of primary data and administrative data of health insurance for the purpose of health economic evaluations are compared. Finally we present an overview of recently performed health economic evaluations based on administrative data in Germany and conclude with lessons from other countries on the use of administrative data and implications for Germany.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 31%
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Social Sciences 2 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,773
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
#730
of 919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,650
of 162,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.