| Title |
Electronic Prescribing Improves Medication Safety in Community-Based Office Practices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-009-1238-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rainu Kaushal, Lisa M. Kern, Yolanda Barrón, Jill Quaresimo, Erika L. Abramson |
| Abstract |
Although electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) holds promise for preventing prescription errors in the ambulatory setting, research on its effectiveness is inconclusive. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 50% |
| Israel | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 215 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 11% |
| Researcher | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 10% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 49 | 21% |
| Unknown | 55 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 20 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 18 | 8% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 34 | 15% |
| Unknown | 64 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,327,133
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,072
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,476
of 96,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#6
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.