| Title |
Is Motorized Treadmill Running Biomechanically Comparable to Overground Running? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Over Studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sports Medicine, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40279-019-01237-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bas Van Hooren, Joel T. Fuller, Jonathan D. Buckley, Jayme R. Miller, Kerry Sewell, Guillaume Rao, Christian Barton, Chris Bishop, Richard W. Willy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 356 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 41 | 12% |
| United States | 35 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 29 | 8% |
| France | 13 | 4% |
| Canada | 12 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 11 | 3% |
| Brazil | 6 | 2% |
| Australia | 6 | 2% |
| Japan | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 53 | 15% |
| Unknown | 145 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 265 | 74% |
| Scientists | 61 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 27 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 417 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 417 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 12% |
| Researcher | 40 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 7% |
| Other | 62 | 15% |
| Unknown | 124 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 114 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 48 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 8% |
| Engineering | 30 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 8% |
| Unknown | 152 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 379. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#83,619
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#70
of 2,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,732
of 479,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#5
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.