↓ Skip to main content

Developing an action plan for patient radiation safety in adult cardiovascular medicine Proceedings from the Duke University Clinical Research Institute/American College of Cardiology Foundation/Americ…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Developing an action plan for patient radiation safety in adult cardiovascular medicine Proceedings from the Duke University Clinical Research Institute/American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Think Tank Held on February 28, 2011
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12350-012-9545-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pamela S. Douglas, J. Jeffrey Carr, Manuel D. Cerqueira, Jennifer E. Cummings, Thomas C. Gerber, Debabrata Mukherjee, Allen J. Taylor

Abstract

Technological advances and increased utilization of medical testing and procedures have prompted greater attention to ensuring the patient safety of radiation use in the practice of adult cardiovascular medicine. In response, representatives from cardiovascular imaging societies, private payers, government and nongovernmental agencies, industry, medical physicists, and patient representatives met to develop goals and strategies toward this end; this report provides an overview of the discussions. This expert "think tank" reached consensus on several broad directions including: the need for broad collaboration across a large number of diverse stakeholders; clarification of the relationship between medical radiation and stochastic events; required education of ordering and providing physicians, and creation of a culture of safety; development of infrastructure to support robust dose assessment and longitudinal tracking; continued close attention to patient selection by balancing the benefit of cardiovascular testing and procedures against carefully minimized radiation exposures; collation, dissemination, and implementation of best practices; and robust education, not only across the healthcare community but also to patients, the public, and media. Finally, because patient radiation safety in cardiovascular imaging is complex, any proposed actions need to be carefully vetted (and monitored) for possible unintended consequences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Belgium 1 4%
Unknown 23 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Professor 4 15%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 7 27%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 38%
Social Sciences 3 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Unspecified 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2012.
All research outputs
#14,277,392
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#839
of 2,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,217
of 179,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.