↓ Skip to main content

Perceived pain extent is associated with disability, depression and self‐efficacy in individuals with whiplash‐associated disorders

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pain, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
47 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perceived pain extent is associated with disability, depression and self‐efficacy in individuals with whiplash‐associated disorders
Published in
European Journal of Pain, May 2016
DOI 10.1002/ejp.873
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. Falla, A. Peolsson, G. Peterson, M.L. Ludvigsson, E. Soldini, A. Schneebeli, M. Barbero

Abstract

Completion of a pain drawing is a familiar task in those presenting with whiplash-associated disorders (WAD). Some people report pain almost over their entire body. Yet the reasons for larger pain extent have not been fully explored. A novel method was applied to quantify pain extent from the pain drawings of 205 individuals with chronic WAD. Pain extent was evaluated in relation to sex, age, educational level, insurance status and financial status. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to verify whether pain extent was associated with other health indicators including perceived pain and disability, health-related quality of life, pain catastrophizing, anxiety, depression and self-efficacy. Pain extent was influenced by sex (χ(2) :10.392, p < 0.001) with larger pain extent in women compared to men (7.88 ± 7.66% vs. 5.40 ± 6.44%). People with unsettled insurance claims (χ(2) : 7.500, p < 0.05) and those with a worse financial situation (χ(2) :12.223, p < 0.01) also had larger pain extent. Multiple linear regression models revealed that, when accounting for age, sex, education, insurance status, financial status and neck pain intensity, pain extent remained associated with perceived disability (p < 0.01), depression (p < 0.05) and self-efficacy (p < 0.001). By utilizing a novel method for pain extent quantification, this study shows that widespread pain is associated with a number of factors including perceived disability, depression and self-efficacy in individuals with chronic WAD. Widespread pain should alert the clinician to consider more specific psychological screening, particularly for depression and self-efficacy, in patients with WAD. WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD?: Women with chronic WAD, those with unsettled insurance claims and those with poorer financial status perceive more widespread pain. When controlling for these factors, larger pain areas remain associated with perceived pain and disability, depression and self-efficacy. The pain drawing is useful to support psychological screening in people with chronic WAD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 173 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 17%
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Other 10 6%
Other 37 21%
Unknown 52 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 21%
Psychology 8 5%
Sports and Recreations 6 3%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 62 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2017.
All research outputs
#1,218,505
of 24,484,013 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pain
#140
of 1,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,998
of 303,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pain
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,484,013 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.