↓ Skip to main content

MultiPhen: Joint Model of Multiple Phenotypes Can Increase Discovery in GWAS

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
332 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
334 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MultiPhen: Joint Model of Multiple Phenotypes Can Increase Discovery in GWAS
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0034861
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul F. O’Reilly, Clive J. Hoggart, Yotsawat Pomyen, Federico C. F. Calboli, Paul Elliott, Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin, Lachlan J. M. Coin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 334 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 2%
United States 4 1%
Finland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 320 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 91 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 23%
Student > Master 33 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Student > Bachelor 16 5%
Other 55 16%
Unknown 41 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 115 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 7%
Computer Science 20 6%
Mathematics 20 6%
Other 44 13%
Unknown 53 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2012.
All research outputs
#16,363,465
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#144,058
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,570
of 179,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,136
of 3,731 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,731 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.