You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Embryonal precursors of Wilms tumor
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aax1323 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tim H H Coorens, Taryn D Treger, Reem Al-Saadi, Luiza Moore, Maxine G B Tran, Thomas J Mitchell, Suzanne Tugnait, Christine Thevanesan, Matthew D Young, Thomas R W Oliver, Minou Oostveen, Grace Collord, Patrick S Tarpey, Alex Cagan, Yvette Hooks, Mark Brougham, Ben C Reynolds, Giuseppe Barone, John Anderson, Mette Jorgensen, G A Amos Burke, Johannes Visser, James C Nicholson, Naima Smeulders, Imran Mushtaq, Grant D Stewart, Peter J Campbell, David C Wedge, Iñigo Martincorena, Dyanne Rampling, Liz Hook, Anne Y Warren, Nicholas Coleman, Tanzina Chowdhury, Neil Sebire, Jarno Drost, Kourosh Saeb-Parsy, Michael R Stratton, Karin Straathof, Kathy Pritchard-Jones, Sam Behjati |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 25% |
| United States | 11 | 19% |
| Germany | 3 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Iceland | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 30 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 21 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 161 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 53 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 11% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 56 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 137. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#308,946
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Science
#8,265
of 83,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,339
of 479,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#130
of 842 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 842 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.