↓ Skip to main content

Constraining the Evolutionary History of the Moon and the Inner Solar System: A Case for New Returned Lunar Samples

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 1,214)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Constraining the Evolutionary History of the Moon and the Inner Solar System: A Case for New Returned Lunar Samples
Published in
Space Science Reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11214-019-0622-x
Authors

Romain Tartèse, Mahesh Anand, Jérôme Gattacceca, Katherine H. Joy, James I. Mortimer, John F. Pernet-Fisher, Sara Russell, Joshua F. Snape, Benjamin P. Weiss

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Master 8 10%
Professor 6 8%
Other 4 5%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 23 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 35 45%
Physics and Astronomy 8 10%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Mathematics 1 1%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 29 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2023.
All research outputs
#381,414
of 25,364,936 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#14
of 1,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,098
of 472,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.