↓ Skip to main content

Microvascular contributions to age-related macular degeneration (AMD): from mechanisms of choriocapillaris aging to novel interventions

Overview of attention for article published in GeroScience, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Microvascular contributions to age-related macular degeneration (AMD): from mechanisms of choriocapillaris aging to novel interventions
Published in
GeroScience, December 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11357-019-00138-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agnes Lipecz, Lauren Miller, Illes Kovacs, Cecília Czakó, Tamas Csipo, Judit Baffi, Anna Csiszar, Stefano Tarantini, Zoltan Ungvari, Andriy Yabluchanskiy, Shannon Conley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 34 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Sports and Recreations 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 40 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#15,473,264
of 23,764,938 outputs
Outputs from GeroScience
#413
of 540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,691
of 462,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GeroScience
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,764,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.