↓ Skip to main content

Pills, pluralism, risk and citizenship: Theorising e-pharmacies

Overview of attention for article published in BioSocieties, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Pills, pluralism, risk and citizenship: Theorising e-pharmacies
Published in
BioSocieties, August 2012
DOI 10.1057/biosoc.2012.11
Authors

Bianca Brijnath

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 10 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Chemistry 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 13 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2012.
All research outputs
#4,695,819
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from BioSocieties
#234
of 393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,271
of 167,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioSocieties
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.