↓ Skip to main content

Resistance to HIV Infection

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Urban Health, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
Title
Resistance to HIV Infection
Published in
Journal of Urban Health, February 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11524-005-9003-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Marmor, K. Hertzmark, S. M. Thomas, P. N. Halkitis, M. Vogler

Abstract

The biological correlates of an effective immune response that could contain or prevent HIV infection remain elusive despite substantial scientific accomplishments in understanding the interactions among the virus, the individual and the community. The observation that some individuals appear to possess resistance to HIV infection or its consequences has generated a host of epidemiologic investigations to identify biological or behavioral characteristics of these individuals. These data might hold the keys to developing appropriate strategies for mimicking the effective responses of those who appear immune. In this paper we review genetic mechanisms including the role of chemokines and their receptors, cytokines, host genetic immune response to HIV infection, local immune response correlating with behavioral variables, co-infection and immune based mechanisms that have been elucidated so far. We offer suggestions for how to use these observations as platforms for future research to further understand natural resistance to HIV infection through cohort studies, population genotype sampling, mathematical modeling of virus-host interactions and behavioral analyses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 152 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 48 30%
Student > Master 32 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 25 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#687,940
of 24,938,276 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#105
of 1,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,461
of 167,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,938,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.