↓ Skip to main content

Pilot experience of multidisciplinary team discussion dedicated to inherited pulmonary fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Pilot experience of multidisciplinary team discussion dedicated to inherited pulmonary fibrosis
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13023-019-1256-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raphael Borie, Caroline Kannengiesser, Laurent Gouya, Clairelyne Dupin, Serge Amselem, Ibrahima Ba, Vincent Bunel, Philippe Bonniaud, Diane Bouvry, Aurélie Cazes, Annick Clement, Marie Pierre Debray, Philippe Dieude, Ralph Epaud, Pascale Fanen, Elodie Lainey, Marie Legendre, Aurélie Plessier, Flore Sicre de Fontbrune, Lidwine Wemeau-Stervinou, Vincent Cottin, Nadia Nathan, Bruno Crestani

Abstract

Genetic testing is proposed for suspected cases of monogenic pulmonary fibrosis, but clinicians and patients need specific information and recommendation about the related diagnosis and management issues. Because multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) has been shown to improve accuracy of interstitial lung disease (ILD) diagnosis, we evaluated the feasibility of a genetic MDD (geneMDD) dedicated to the indication for and interpretation of genetic testing. The geneMDD group met monthly and included pediatric and adult lung specialists with ILD expertise, molecular and clinical geneticists, and one radiologist. Hematologists, rheumatologists, dermatologists, hepatologists, and pathologists were also invited to attend. Since 2016, physicians from 34 different centers in 7 countries have participated in the geneMDD. The medical files of 95 patients (53 males) have been discussed. The median age of patients was 43 years [range 0-77], 10 were ≤ 15 years old, and 6 were deceased at the time of the discussion. Among 85 analyses available, the geneMDD considered the rare gene variants pathogenic for 61: 37 variants in telomere-related genes, 23 variants in surfactant-related genes and 1 variant in MARS. Genetic counseling was offered for relatives of these patients. The geneMDD therapeutic proposals were as follows: antifibrotic drugs (n = 25), steroids or immunomodulatory therapy (n = 18), organ transplantation (n = 21), watch and wait (n = 21), or best supportive care (n = 4). Our experience shows that a dedicated geneMDD is feasible regardless of a patient's age and provides a unique opportunity to adapt patient management and therapy in this very rare condition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 20 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Unknown 22 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#13,585,641
of 23,426,104 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,390
of 2,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,521
of 461,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#22
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,426,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.