You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Looking beyond Translation — Integrating Clinical Research with Medical Practice
|
---|---|
Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, May 2012
|
DOI | 10.1056/nejmp1201850 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Annetine C. Gelijns, Sherine E. Gabriel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 47% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
France | 1 | 5% |
Colombia | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
Italy | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 74% |
Scientists | 3 | 16% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Philippines | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 65 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 19% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 10% |
Professor | 6 | 8% |
Other | 18 | 25% |
Unknown | 12 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 42% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 9 | 12% |
Unknown | 19 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,955,967
of 25,138,857 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#15,904
of 32,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,118
of 168,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#182
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,138,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 121.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.