↓ Skip to main content

ホタテガイの遊泳に関する構成論的アプローチ (外套膜の特性が遊泳に与える影響の実験的検証)

Overview of attention for article published in Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese), December 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ホタテガイの遊泳に関する構成論的アプローチ (外套膜の特性が遊泳に与える影響の実験的検証)
Published in
Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese), December 2019
DOI 10.1299/transjsme.19-00151
Authors

岡田 光貴, 末岡 裕一郎, 中西 大輔, 大須賀 公一

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2019.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese)
#100
of 550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296,996
of 474,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese)
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 550 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.