↓ Skip to main content

Stepping in Elton’s footprints: a general scaling model for body masses and trophic levels across ecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology Letters, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stepping in Elton’s footprints: a general scaling model for body masses and trophic levels across ecosystems
Published in
Ecology Letters, December 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01568.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jens O. Riede, Ulrich Brose, Bo Ebenman, Ute Jacob, Ross Thompson, Colin R. Townsend, Tomas Jonsson

Abstract

Despite growing awareness of the significance of body-size and predator-prey body-mass ratios for the stability of ecological networks, our understanding of their distribution within ecosystems is incomplete. Here, we study the relationships between predator and prey size, body-mass ratios and predator trophic levels using body-mass estimates of 1313 predators (invertebrates, ectotherm and endotherm vertebrates) from 35 food-webs (marine, stream, lake and terrestrial). Across all ecosystem and predator types, except for streams (which appear to have a different size structure in their predator-prey interactions), we find that (1) geometric mean prey mass increases with predator mass with a power-law exponent greater than unity and (2) predator size increases with trophic level. Consistent with our theoretical derivations, we show that the quantitative nature of these relationships implies systematic decreases in predator-prey body-mass ratios with the trophic level of the predator. Thus, predators are, on an average, more similar in size to their prey at the top of food-webs than that closer to the base. These findings contradict the traditional Eltonian paradigm and have implications for our understanding of body-mass constraints on food-web topology, community dynamics and stability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 235 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 26%
Researcher 66 25%
Student > Master 21 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 26 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 131 51%
Environmental Science 68 26%
Physics and Astronomy 5 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 <1%
Other 9 3%
Unknown 39 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2012.
All research outputs
#20,653,708
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#3,023
of 3,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,175
of 190,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#29
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.