↓ Skip to main content

Enzymatic degradation of granular potato starch by Microbacterium aurum strain B8.A

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Enzymatic degradation of granular potato starch by Microbacterium aurum strain B8.A
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00253-011-3436-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fean D. Sarian, Rachel M. van der Kaaij, Slavko Kralj, Dirk-Jan Wijbenga, Doede J. Binnema, Marc J. E. C. van der Maarel, Lubbert Dijkhuizen

Abstract

Microbacterium aurum strain B8.A was isolated from the sludge of a potato starch-processing factory on the basis of its ability to use granular starch as carbon- and energy source. Extracellular enzymes hydrolyzing granular starch were detected in the growth medium of M. aurum B8.A, while the type strain M. aurum DSMZ 8600 produced very little amylase activity, and hence was unable to degrade granular starch. The strain B8.A extracellular enzyme fraction degraded wheat, tapioca and potato starch at 37 °C, well below the gelatinization temperature of these starches. Starch granules of potato were hydrolyzed more slowly than of wheat and tapioca, probably due to structural differences and/or surface area effects. Partial hydrolysis of starch granules by extracellular enzymes of strain B8.A resulted in large holes of irregular sizes in case of wheat and tapioca and many smaller pores of relatively homogeneous size in case of potato. The strain B8.A extracellular amylolytic system produced mainly maltotriose and maltose from both granular and soluble starch substrates; also, larger maltooligosaccharides were formed after growth of strain B8.A in rich medium. Zymogram analysis confirmed that a different set of amylolytic enzymes was present depending on the growth conditions of M. aurum B8.A. Some of these enzymes could be partly purified by binding to starch granules.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 72 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 27%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 23%
Engineering 6 8%
Environmental Science 5 7%
Chemistry 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 14 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2014.
All research outputs
#7,480,940
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2,515
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,774
of 119,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#33
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.